WATERFRONT RENAISSANCE ASSOCIATES v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Filing
150
ORDER THAT DEFT'S MOTION TO DISMISS COUNT FIFTEEN OF THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 3/30/10. 3/30/10 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED: COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE DEFTS AND UNREPRESENTED PARTY.(kw, )
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA WATERFRONT RENAISSANCE ASSOCIATES, Plaintiff v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, et al., Defendants : : : : : : : : ORDER A N D NOW, this 30th day of March, 2010, upon consideration of defendant's m o tio n to dismiss count fifteen of the second amended complaint (Doc. # 125), plaintiff's re s p o n s e thereto (Doc. # 126), and defendant's reply (Doc. # 130), it is hereby O R D E R E D that the defendant's motion is DENIED. CIVIL ACTION
NO. 07-1045
BY THE COURT:
/s/ LAWRENCE F. STENGEL LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J.
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
