LINCOLN v. PALAKOVICH et al

Filing 35

ORDER THAT: PETITIONER'S MOTION IS GRANTED. THIS COURT'S ORDER DATED 8/24/11, IS VACATED. THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS GRANTED. PETITIONER'S CONVICTION AND SENTENCE ARE VACATED, AND PETITIONER SHALL BE RELEASED FROM CUSTODY, UNLESS PETITIONER'S RIGHTS TO A DIRECT APPEAL ON THE MERITS HAVE BEEN REINSTATED NUNC PRO TUNC WITHIN 90 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE NORMA L. SHAPIRO ON 4/2/14. 4/3/14 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(fb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ROBERT LINCOLN, Petitioner, v. JOHN A. PALAKOVICH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondents. : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION No. 07-1373 ORDER AND NOW, this 2nd day of April, 2014, upon consideration of the Rule 60 Motion of Petitioner Robert Lincoln for Relief from Judgment of Order (ECF No. 31), the Commonwealth’s Response to Petitioner’s Rule 60 Motion (ECF No. 32), and the Reply Brief in Support of Petitioner’s Rule 60 Motion for Relief from Judgment or Order (ECF No. 33), it appearing that extraordinary circumstances exist so that denying petitioner’s requested relief will result in extreme hardship. It is ORDERED that: 1. Petitioner’s Motion is GRANTED. 2. This court’s Order dated August 24, 2011, is VACATED. 3. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is GRANTED. 4. Petitioner’s conviction and sentence are VACATED, and petitioner shall be RELEASED from custody, UNLESS petitioner’s rights to a direct appeal on the merits have been reinstated nunc pro tunc within 90 days from the date of this Order. 5. Having granted a conditional writ of habeas corpus, there is no need to consider a certificate of appealability for petitioner. /s/ Norma L. Shapiro J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?