ROBINSON v. PORGES et al

Filing 99

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND/OR FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ARE GRANTED; DEFENDANT BARBARA PORGES'S MOTION TO SET ASIDE ENTRY OF DEFAULT IS GRANTED; PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED; AND THE CLERK SHALL MARK THE CASE AS CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 1/29/10. 2/1/10 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO ROBINSON, CANDELL, E-MAILED, MAILED UNREPS.(fdc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SIMEON ROBINSON v. BARBARA PORGES, et al. : : : : : ORDER AND NOW, this 29th day of January, 2010, upon consideration of defendants' CIVIL ACTION No. 07-1390 Motions to Dismiss and/or for Summary Judgment, and plaintiff's responses thereto, the Court concludes that it lacks subject matter jurisdiction over the present case. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Defendants' Motions to Dismiss and/or for Summary Judgment (Docs. 21, 22, 26, 27, 32, 54, 55, 82, 95, 96) are GRANTED; 2. Defendant Barbara Porges's Motion to Set Aside Entry of Default (Doc. 84) is GRANTED; 3. 4. Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Doc. 18) is DISMISSED; and The Clerk shall mark the case as CLOSED. BY THE COURT s/Michael M. Baylson Michael M. Baylson, U.S.D.J. O :\C I V I L 07-08\07-1390 Robinson v. Porges\07-1390 Robinson v Porges - order 1-29-10.wpd

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?