WARSHAW v. CONCENTRA HEALTH SERVICES et al

Filing 91

ORDER THAT DEFENDANT TEKSYSTEMS, INC.'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 60 , IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; DEFENDANT ALLEGIS GROUP INC.'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 60 , IS GRANTED; PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT 58 , IS DENIED; AND DEFENDANT CONCENTRA HEALTH SERVICES'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 57 , IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LOUIS H. POLLAK ON 6/14/10. 6/15/10 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(ti, )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
F O R THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

BRIAN 'WARSHAW, Plaintiff,
v.

CIVIL ACTION No. 07-1994

CONCENTRA HEALTH SERVICES, et aI., Defendants.

PIL!D

JUN 14 2010
By,

MICHAEL E. KUNZ, Clerk

Pep. Clerk

ORDER AND NOW, this IL{ day of June, 2010, for the reasons discussed in the accompanying opinion, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
(1) Defendant TEKsystems, Inco's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 60)

is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The motion is granted as to (a) Counts I and IV of the First Amended Complaint, and (b) Counts II and V, insofar as those counts rest on the failure ofTEKsystems, Inc. to rehire plaintiff in positions for which he did not formally apply. The motion is otherwise denied; (2) Defendant Allegis Group Inco's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 60) is GRANTED; (3) Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Docket No. 58) is DENIED; and

(4) Defendant Concentra Health Services's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 57) is DENIED.

BY THE COURT:

P o l l a k , J.

L

K,DiV.L-