JAMES v. FOLINO et al

Filing 22

ORDER THAT PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS ARE OVERRULED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED. A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY WILL NOT ISSUE.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE R. BARCLAY SURRICK ON 8/25/15. 8/26/15 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER, E-MAILED TO COUNSEL AND 1 COPY TO LEGAL BIN.(pr, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA RONALD JAMES v. LOUIS FOLINO, ET AL. : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-2162 ORDER AND NOW, this 25th day of August , 2015, upon consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Petitioner Ronald James (ECF No. 1), Respondents’ Answer to Petition for Habeas Relief (ECF No. 13), the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge David Strawbridge (ECF No. 14), and Petitioner’s Objections thereto (ECF No. 20), it is ORDERED as follows: 1. Petitioner’s Objections are OVERRULED. 2. The Petition for Writ Of Habeas Corpus is DENIED. 3. A certificate of appealability will not issue. IT IS SO ORDERED. BY THE COURT: _________________________ R. BARCLAY SURRICK, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?