JAMES v. FOLINO et al
Filing
22
ORDER THAT PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS ARE OVERRULED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED. A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY WILL NOT ISSUE.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE R. BARCLAY SURRICK ON 8/25/15. 8/26/15 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER, E-MAILED TO COUNSEL AND 1 COPY TO LEGAL BIN.(pr, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
RONALD JAMES
v.
LOUIS FOLINO, ET AL.
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 07-2162
ORDER
AND NOW, this 25th
day of August
, 2015, upon consideration of the
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Petitioner Ronald James (ECF No. 1), Respondents’
Answer to Petition for Habeas Relief (ECF No. 13), the Report and Recommendation of
Magistrate Judge David Strawbridge (ECF No. 14), and Petitioner’s Objections thereto (ECF No.
20), it is ORDERED as follows:
1.
Petitioner’s Objections are OVERRULED.
2.
The Petition for Writ Of Habeas Corpus is DENIED.
3.
A certificate of appealability will not issue.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT:
_________________________
R. BARCLAY SURRICK, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?