FRONTLINE PLACEMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. CRS, INC.

Filing 95

ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT'S COUNTERCLAIMS RELATING TO THE '519 PATENT IS GRANTED. COUNTERCLAIMS III AND IV OF THE AMENDED ANSWER ARE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 12/22/11. 12/23/11 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(jl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
FRONTLINE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
Plaintiff,

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

v.
CRS, INC.,
Defendant.

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 07-2457

O R D E R
AND NOW, this 22nd day of December, 2011, it is hereby
ORDERED as follows:
(1) Plaintiff’s unopposed motion to amend the
complaint (ECF No. 66) is GRANTED;1
(2) Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss Defendant’s
counterclaims relating to the ’519 Patent is GRANTED; and
(3) Counterclaims III and IV of the Amended Answer are
DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Eduardo C. Robreno__
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, J.

1

The Second Amended Complaint attached as Exhibit B to
the Motion to Dismiss and Amend should be filed of record by
Plaintiff within five days.