SAYLOR v. AUTOZONE, INC.

Filing 37

ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS MICHAEL P. SAYLOR'S MOTION IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; THE DEFENDANT AUTOZONE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF MICHAEL P. SAYLOR AND AGAINST DEFENDANT AUTOZONE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $10,000.00. SIGNED BY HONORABLE TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE ON 9/23/10. 9/23/10 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED.(rf, )

Download PDF
SAYLOR v. AUTOZONE, INC. Doc. 37 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MICHAEL P. SAYLOR v. AUTOZONE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION : : : : : : ORDER CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-2491 AND NOW, this 23rd day of September, 2010, upon consideration of the Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendant Autozone Development Corporation (Document No. 18), Plaintiff Michael P. Saylor's Motion for Summary Judgment (Document No. 19), the Joint Stipulation of Agreed-Upon Facts and Statement of Facts Upon Which the Parties Cannot Agree (Document No. 16), the responses to the motions, and the Order renewing the cross-motions (Document No. 34), it is ORDERED as follows: 1. IN PART; 2. The defendant Autozone Development Corporation's motion for summary The plaintiff Michael P. Saylor's motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED judgment is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; 3. JUDGMENT is entered in favor of plaintiff Michael P. Saylor and against defendant Autozone Development Corporation in the amount of $10,000. /s/ Timothy J. Savage TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE, J. Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?