MAYAN v. RYDBOM EXPRESS, INC. et al

Filing 96

ORDER THAT DEFTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC #74) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. THE PLFFS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC #79) IS DENIED. THE DEFTS' MOTION FOR DECERTIFICATION (DOC #77) IS DENIED. ( SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 9/30/09. ) 9/30/09 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(gn, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KYLE MAYAN, P laintiff v. RYDBOM EXPRESS, INC. and DOUGLAS H. RYDBOM, D efe n d a n ts : : : : : : : : : C I V I L ACTION

N O . 07-2658

ORDER S T E N G E L , J. A N D NOW, this 30th day of September, 2009, upon careful consideration of the d e f en d a n ts ' motion for summary judgment (Document #74), the plaintiffs' motion for p a r tia l summary judgment (Document #79), the responses thereto, and the defendants' m o tio n for decertification (Document #77) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. T h e defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED in part and D E N I E D in part. T h e plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment is DENIED. T h e defendants' motion for decertification is DENIED.

2. 3.

B Y THE COURT:

/s/ Lawrence F. Stengel LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J.