MILLER v. DIGUGLIELMO et al

Filing 76

ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS DAVID DIGUGLIELMO AND MICHAEL LORENZO ARE DISMISSED FROM THIS CASE, WITH PREJUDICE. DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT SHALL BE GRANTED AS TO PLAINTIFF'S THIRD AND FOURTH COUNT. COUNSEL WILL FOLLOW PROCEDURES DISC USSED AT ORAL ARGUMENT AS TO THE FIRST AND SECOND COUNTS AS TO WHICH DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL SHALL FILE A SUPPLEMENTAL PRETRIAL STATEMENT NO LATER THAN 1/22/2010. A TELEPHONE CONFERENCE WILL BE HELD WITH COUNSEL ON 1/25/2010 AT 4:30 PM. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 12/15/2009. 12/16/2009 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KENNETH MALIK MILLER v. DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, et al. : : : : : ORDER AND NOW, this 15th day of December, 2009, based on the foregoing Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Defendants David Diguglielmo and Michael Lorenzo are DISMISSED from the CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-2686 case, with prejudice. 2. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment shall be GRANTED as to Plaintiff's Third Count (denial of access to courts for legal redress) and Fourth Count (under the Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution). 3. Counsel will follow the procedures discussed at oral argument as to the First and Second Counts, as to which Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED without prejudice. 4. Plaintiff's counsel shall file a supplemental pretrial statement no later than January 22, 2010. A telephone conference will be held with counsel on January 25, 2010 at 4:30 p.m. Plaintiff's counsel will initiate the call, and when all parties are on the line, counsel will call chambers at 267.299.7520. BY THE COURT: /s/ Michael M. Baylson Michael M. Baylson, U.S.D.J. A :\M ille r v. Digugliemo - Order Ds MSJ.wpd

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?