MILLER v. DIGUGLIELMO et al
Filing
86
ORDER THAT PLFF'S MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION OR RECONSIDERATION IS DENIED. DEFTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT REMAINS GRANTED AS TO PLFF'S FOURTH COUNT AS DEFT DAVID DIGUGLIELMO IS NO LONGER A PARTY IN THIS CASE.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 4/14/10. 4/16/10 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED AND FAXED. (COPY OF ORDER SENT TO PRO SE)(lvj, )
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KENNETH MALIK MILLER v. DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, et al. : : : : : ORDER AND NOW, this 14th day of April, 2010, based on the foregoing Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. 2. Plaintiff's Motion for Clarification or Reconsideration (Doc. No. 78) is DENIED. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment remains GRANTED as to Plaintiff's CIVIL ACTION
NO. 07-2686
Fourth Count (under the Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution), as Defendant David DiGuglielmo is no longer a party in this case.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Michael M. Baylson Michael M. Baylson, U.S.D.J.
A :\M ille r v. Digugliemo - Order re Mot for Reconsideration.wpd
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
