TEEPLE v. CARABBA et al

Filing 102

ORDER THAT DEFENDANT DEPUTY D.A. STEPHEN KELLY'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENTIS GRANTED. DEFENDANT DET. KEVIN D. DYKES' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. DEFENDNAT WILLIAM CAHILL'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. DEFENDANT DET. JOSEPH CARABBA'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS DYKES AND CAHILL'S MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY BRIEF ARE DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 12/22/2009. 12/23/2009 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(mbh, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MARK TEEPLE, Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH CARABBA, et al., Defendants. : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-2976

ORDER AND NOW, this 22nd day of December, 2009, for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: (1) Defendant Deputy District Attorney Stephen Kelly's motion for summary judgment (doc. no. 82) is GRANTED; (2) Defendant Detective Kevin D. Dykes' motion for summary judgment (doc. no. 83) is GRANTED; (3) Defendant William Cahill's motion for summary judgment (doc. no. 84) is GRANTED; (4) Defendant Detective Joseph Carabba's motion for summary judgment (doc. no. 85)is GRANTED; It is further ORDERED that Defendants Dykes and Cahill's motions for leave to file a reply brief (doc. nos. 93, 94) are DENIED.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Eduardo C. Robreno EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, J.