JOHNSON v. CHAMBERLAIN et al

Filing 40

ORDER THAT THE PETITION IS DENIED WITH PREJUDICE AND WITHOUT A HEARING. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT NO CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY WILL BE ISSUED PURSUANT TO 28 USC, SECTION 2253 BECAUSE PETITIONER HAS FAILED TO MAKE A SUBSTANTIAL SHOWING OF A DENIAL OF A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS CASE CLOSED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LOWELL A. REED, JR ON 8/19/10. 8/20/10 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(pr, )

Download PDF
JOHNSON v. CHAMBERLAIN et al Doc. 40 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA L A T E E F A H JOHNSON v. D A W N CHAMBERLAIN, et al. : : : : : C IV IL ACTION N o . 07-3137 ORDER A N D NOW, this 19th day of August 2010, upon careful consideration of the p e titio n for a writ of habeas corpus, the responses and reply thereto (Doc. Nos. 1, 7, 14, 3 4 ), it is hereby ORDERED that for the reasons set forth above, the petition is DENIED W I T H PREJUDICE AND WITHOUT A HEARING. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no certificate of appealability will be issued p u rs u a n t to 28 U.S.C. § 2253 because Petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing o f a denial of a constitutional right. T h e Clerk of Court is hereby directed to mark this case closed. S/Lowell A. Reed, Jr. LOWELL A. REED, JR., Sr. J. Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?