BENCKINI v. UPPERSAUCON TOWNSHIP, ET, AL. et al
Filing
111
ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFF BENCKINI'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOCKET NO. 79) IS DENIED. DEFENDANT OSWALD'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED (DOCKET NO. 81). SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 04/21/2009. 04/21/2009 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(rab)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA GENE C. BENCKINI t/a BENCKINI NURSERIES, Plaintiff v. BRIAN HAWK, et al., Defendants : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION
NO. 07-3580
ORDER AND NOW, this 21st day of April 2009, upon consideration of Plaintiff Gene C. Benckini's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 79), Defendant Leroy Oswald's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. Nos. 81, 82) and Defendant Oswald's Response to the Benckini Motion (Doc. No. 88), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Benckini's Motion (Doc. No. 79) is DENIED, and Defendant Oswald's Motion (Doc. No. 81, 82) is GRANTED as outlined in the accompanying memorandum.
BY THE COURT:
S/Gene E.K. Pratter GENE E. K. PRATTER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?