TAPP v. PROTO et al

Filing 65

ORDER of MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION (DOC. 64) - DOC. 41, DOC. 42 AND DOC. 45, DEFENDNTS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ARE GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFF SEAN TAPP'S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARYJUDGMENT (DOC. #56) IS DENIED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE ANITA B. BRODY ON 5/12/2010. 5/13/2010 ENTERED AND COPIES VIA ECF AND U.S. MAIL.(mo, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SEAN TAPP Plaintiff, v. ANDY PROTO, et al., Defendants. : : : : : : : : :

CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-3725

ORDER

AND NOW, this __12th____ day of May 2010, upon consideration of the Motions for Summary Judgment of Defendants Andy Proto, Gilberto Crespo, Nicole Goldbach, Brenda Williams, Jose Alvarez, and Inez Cedeno (Doc. #41), as well as for Defendants Romanowski, Warden Guarini, Deputy Warden Siemasko, Major Klinovski; Sergeants Wolffe, Trudel, and LeFever; and C.O.s Masterangelo, Brown, McCormick, Ovens, Minotti, Zimmerman, Brendle, Booth, Yeingst, Coco, Barley, and Deford (Doc. #42); and Nurses Downs and Hehnly (Doc. #45), it is ORDERED that moving Defendants' motions are GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff Sean Tapp's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #56) is DENIED. s/Anita B. Brody

ANITA B. BRODY, J.

Copies VIA ECF on _______ to:

Copies MAILED on _______ to: