WALTMAN v. COSCO, INC.

Filing 196

ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SANCTIONS DUE TO SPOLIATION IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY HONORABLE BERLE M. SCHILLER ON 7/18/2011. 7/18/2011 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA THE PENNSYLVANIA TRUST COMPANY, Guardian of the Estate of Ethan Waltman, a Minor, Plaintiff, v. DOREL JUVENILE GROUP, INC., Defendant. : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION No. 07-4029 ORDER AND NOW, this 18th day of July, 2011, upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion for Sanctions Due to Spoliation, Plaintiff’s Response thereto, the parties supplemental briefing thereon, following oral argument with counsel for the parties on June 27, 2011, and for the reasons stated in this Court’s Memorandum dated July 18, 2011, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion (Document No. 150) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, as follows: 1. Defendant’s Motion is GRANTED insofar as the Court shall impose the following spoliation sanctions: a. Benjamin Waltman and Kimberly Waltman shall not offer any testimony identifying the Grand Explorer booster seat as being used by Ethan Waltman on March 4, 2006. b. The Court will instruct the jury that it may draw an adverse inference from Plaintiff’s destruction of evidence with respect to the issues of product identification and seatbelt tension. 2. Defendant’s Motion is DENIED insofar as the Court declines to instruct the jury to find a specific seatbelt tension at the time of the crash. BY THE COURT: Berle M. Schiller, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?