ALEXANDER et al v. WASHINGTON MUTUAL, INC. et al

Filing 86

MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION ORDER THAT FDIC-RECEIVER'S MOTION TO STRIKE CLASS ALLEGATIONS FROM THE COMPLAINT IS DENIED AS MOOT. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THE CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 6/28/2011. 6/29/2011 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (ems)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ROBERT ALEXANDER and JAMES
LEE REED, individually and on behalf of
all others similarly situated
v.
WASHINGTON MUTUAL, INC.;
WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK;
WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK FSB; and
WM REINSURANCE MORTGAGE
REINSURANCE COMPANY

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 07-4426

ORDER
AND NOW, this 28th day of June, 2011, upon consideration of FDIC-Receiver’s
motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), plaintiffs’ response,
FDIC-Receiver’s reply and the oral argument of the parties it is ORDERED that FDICReceiver’s motion is GRANTED and plaintiffs’ complaint is DISMISSED.
It is FURTHER ORDERED that FDIC-Receiver’s Motion to Strike Class Allegations
from the Complaint is DENIED as MOOT.
The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case.

s/Thomas N. O’Neill, Jr.
THOMAS N. O'NEILL, JR., J.