SEGAL et al v. STRAUSSER ENTERPRISES, INC. et al
Filing
340
OPINION/ORDER THAT THE STRAUSSER DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF TAX RETURNS OF MR. SEGAL AND THE TRUST IS DENIED. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE HENRY S. PERKIN ON 8/8/13. 8/8/13 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ky, )
SEGAL et al v. STRAUSSER ENTERPRISES, INC. et al
Doc. 340
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
__________________________________________
:
KENNETH SEGAL, et al
:
:
CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-4647
Plaintiffs
:
:
vs.
:
:
STRAUSSER ENTERPRISES, INC., et al
:
:
Defendants
:
__________________________________________:
ORDER
AND NOW, this
8th
day of August, 2013, upon consideration of the remand
Order of the Honorable James Knoll Gardner dated March 22, 2013 (Docket No. 329); upon
consideration of Defendants Strausser Enterprises, Inc.’s and Gary Strausser’s Memorandum of
Law in Support of Motion to Compel Production of Tax Returns of Plaintiffs Ken Segal and the
Karen and Kenneth Segal Descendants Trust filed April 9, 2013 (Docket No. 332); upon
consideration of Plaintiffs’ Argument Brief in Opposition to the Discoverability of Plaintiffs’
Tax Returns filed April 9, 2013 (Docket No. 331); upon consideration of plaintiffs’ April 24,
2013 correspondence in response to questions posed by the undersigned during the April 11,
2013 hearing; after hearing held April 11, 2013, and for the reasons expressed in the foregoing
Memorandum,
IT IS ORDERED that the Strausser defendants’ motion to compel production of
tax returns of Mr. Segal and the Trust is DENIED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Henry S. Perkin
HENRY S. PERKIN
United States Magistrate Judge
Dockets.Justia.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?