SEGAL et al v. STRAUSSER ENTERPRISES, INC. et al
Filing
443
ORDER THAT STRAUSSER DEFENDANTS MOTION TO STAY (ECF DOCKET NO. 427 ) IS DENIED AS MOOT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 10/24/19. 10/25/19 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO ATTORNEYS AND E-MAILED.(mas, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
KENNETH SEGAL, ADAM SEGAL, as trustee for
and on behalf of THE KAREN AND KENNETH
SEGAL DESCENDANTS TRUST, and SEGAL AND
MOREL, INC.
Plaintiffs,
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 07-4647
v.
STRAUSSER ENTERPRISES, INC.,
GARY STRAUSSER, and
LEONARD MELLON,
Defendants.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 24th day of October 2019, after reviewing Defendants Strausser
Enterprises, Inc. and Gary Strausser’s (“Strausser Defendants”) Motion to Stay, and any
opposition thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that Strausser Defendants’ Motion to Stay (ECF
Docket No. 427) is DENIED as moot. 1
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Jeffrey L. Schmehl
Jeffrey L. Schmehl, J.
1
In response to this Court’s June 12, 2019 order denying summary judgment (ECF Docket No. 412), Strausser
Defendants filed a Motion for Reconsideration or, in the Alternative, Certification of an Interlocutory Appeal on
June 24, 2019 (ECF Docket No. 414). Co-defendant Leonard Mellon filed a similar motion on the same day (ECF
Docket No. 415). Strausser Defendants filed the present Motion to Stay seeking to stay this matter pending an
interlocutory appeal to the Third Circuit. As certification for that appeal has been denied, Strausser Defendants’
Motion to Stay is denied as moot.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?