SEGAL et al v. STRAUSSER ENTERPRISES, INC. et al

Filing 656

ORDER THAT DEFENDANT MELLON'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SUR REPLY IS GRANTED AS THE COURT REVIEW THE SUR REPLY IN COMING TO THIS DECISION; PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT IS GRANTED; PLAINTIFF SHALL FILE THEIR AMENDE D COMPLAINT WITHIN FIVE DAYS AND DEFENDANTS SHALL FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING WITHIN THIRTY DAYS OF PLAINTIFFS' FILING OF THE AMENDED COMPLAINT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 09/30/2021. 09/30/2021 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(nd, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
KENNETH SEGAL, ADAM SEGAL,
As trustee for and on behalf of
THE KAREN AND KENNETH SEGAL
DESCENDANTS TRUST, and SEGAL AND
MOREL, INC.,

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 07-4647

Plaintiffs,
v.
STRAUSSER ENTERPRISES, INC.,
GARY STRAUSSER, and
LEONARD MELLON,
Defendants.
ORDER

AND NOW, this 30th day of September, 2021, after review of plaintiffs’ Motion for
Leave to File Amended Complaint, defendant Mellon’s opposition, plaintiffs’ reply, and
Mellon’s Sur Reply, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is
hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. Defendant Mellon’s Motion for Leave to File a Sur Reply is GRANTED as the Court
reviewed the Sur Reply in coming to this decision;
2. Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint is GRANTED;
3. Plaintiffs shall file their Amended Complaint within FIVE DAYS; and
4. Defendants shall file a responsive pleading within THIRTY DAYS of plaintiffs’
filing of the Amended Complaint; and
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Jeffrey L. Schmehl
Jeffrey L. Schmehl, J