D'APUZZO v. JOHN DOE NOS. 1 THROUGH 20 et al
Filing
36
ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS THE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT IN C.A. 07-4963 IS GRANTED; THE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; THE CLERK IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THE CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 7/10/2013; 7/11/2013 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED TO LIAISON COUNSEL. (SEE PAPER # 3368 IN 07-MD-1871). (tjd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN RE: AVANDIA MARKETING, SALES
PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS
LIABILITY LITIGATION
MDLN0.1871
07-MD-01871
THIS DOCUMENT APPLIES TO:
HON. CYNTHIA M. RUFE
RICHARD V. D' APUZZO
on behalf of himself and all others similarly
situated
CIVIL ACTION
v.
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
d/b/a GLAXOSMITHKLINE
NO. 07-4963
ORDER
AND NOW, this lOth day of July 2013, upon consideration ofDefendant's Motion to
Dismiss [Doc. No. 28] and the response and replies thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that the
Motion is GRANTED for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion. The
Third Amended Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE the
case.
It is so ORDERED.
BY THE COURT:
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?