SCHRANK v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT IN C.A. 07-4965 IS GRANTED; THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; THE CLERK IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THE CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 7/10/2013; 7/11/2013 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED TO LIAISON COUNSEL. (SEE PAPER # 3370 IN 07-MD-1871). (tjd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN RE: AVANDIA MARKETING, SALES
PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS
THIS DOCUMENT APPLIES TO:
HON. CYNTHIA M. RUFE
on behalf of herself and all others similarly
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
AND NOW, this 1Oth day of July 2013, upon consideration of Defendant's Motion to
Dismiss [Doc. No. 23; MDL Doc. No. 2011] and the response and replies thereto, it is hereby
ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED for the reasons set forth in the accompanying
Memorandum Opinion. The Second Amended Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. The
Clerk is directed to CLOSE the case.
It is so ORDERED.
BY THE COURT:
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?