SCHRANK v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION

Filing 30

ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT IN C.A. 07-4965 IS GRANTED; THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; THE CLERK IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THE CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 7/10/2013; 7/11/2013 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED TO LIAISON COUNSEL. (SEE PAPER # 3370 IN 07-MD-1871). (tjd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN RE: AVANDIA MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDLN0.1871 07-MD-01871 THIS DOCUMENT APPLIES TO: HON. CYNTHIA M. RUFE SHEILA SCHRANK on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated CIVIL ACTION v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION d/b/a GLAXOSMITHKLINE NO. 07-4965 ORDER AND NOW, this 1Oth day of July 2013, upon consideration of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 23; MDL Doc. No. 2011] and the response and replies thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion. The Second Amended Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE the case. It is so ORDERED. BY THE COURT:

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?