GORDON v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al

Filing 76

ORDER THAT JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF, AND AGAINST DEFENDANTS GARY FLOWERS AND GMF INTERIOR INSTALLATIONS IN THE AMOUNT OF $56,666.60 PLUS INTEREST AND COSTS OF SUIT; AND PLAINTIFF IS AWARDED PUNITIVE GAMAGES IN THE AMOUNT OF 10&# 037; OF THE JUDGMENT, FOR A PUNITIVE DAMAGES AWARD TOTALING $5,666.60. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE STAY OF THE WRIT OF EXECUTION ISSUED TO PNC BANK GRANTED ON 11/6/2009 IS LIFTED FORTHWITH. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CLERK OF THE COURT SHALL MARK THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED CASE AS CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PETRESE B. TUCKER ON 4/9/2010. 4/12/2010 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA M Y R T L E GORDON, P la in t if f , v. C IT Y OF PHILADELPHIA, ET AL., D e f e n d a n ts. : : : : : : : : C IV IL ACTION N O . 07-5039 ORDER A N D NOW, this ___ of April, 2010, following a bench trial and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 52(a), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED as follows: 1. J U D G M E N T IS ENTERED in favor of Plaintiff, and against Defendants Gary Flowers and G M F Interior Installations in the amount of fifty-six thousand six hundred sixty-six dollars ($ 5 6 ,6 6 6 .0 0 ) plus interest and costs of suit; and 2. P lain tiff is awarded punitive damages in the amount of ten percent (10%) of the judgment, for a punitive damages award totaling five thousand six hundred sixty-six dollars and sixty cents ($ 5 ,6 6 6 .6 0 ). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the stay of the Writ of Execution issued to PNC Bank granted on N o vember 6, 2009 (Doc. 58) is LIFTED forthwith. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall mark the above-captioned case as C L O S E D for statistical purposes. B Y THE COURT: /s/ Petrese B. Tucker ____________________________ H o n . Petrese B. Tucker, U.S.D.J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?