SHERZER et al v. HOMESTAR MORTGAGE SERVICES et al

Filing 85

ORDER THAT THE PLAINTIFFS OBJECTIONS, WHICH RESTATE ARGUMENTS MADE BY THE PLAINTIFFS IN THEIR RESPONSE TO THE DEFENDANTS MOTION AND ADDRESSED BY JUDGE HEY IN THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, ARE OVERRULED. THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. THE 52 MOTION IS GRANTED. JUDGMENT IS HEREBY ENTERED IN FAVOR OF HOMESTAR MORTGAGE SERVICES AND HSBC BANK USA ANDAGAINST THE PLAINTIFFS ON COUNT I OF THE PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON 10/24/11. 10/25/11 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(mas, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DANIEL R. SHERZER, et al. : : : : : : v. HOMESTAR MORTGAGE SERVICES, et al. CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-5040 ORDER AND NOW, this 24th day of October, 2011, upon careful and independent consideration of the Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings of Defendants Homestar Mortgage Services, LLC and HSBC Bank USA, As Trustee (Docket No. 52), the opposition and reply thereto, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T. Hey (Docket No. 74), and after consideration of the Plaintiffs’ Objections and Appeal From The Report and Recommendations Re: Homestar, et al.’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Docket No. 83) and the response thereto, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that: 1. The plaintiffs’ Objections, which restate arguments made by the plaintiffs in their response to the defendants motion and addressed by Judge Hey in the Report and Recommendation, are OVERRULED. 2. ADOPTED. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and 3. The motion is GRANTED. Judgment is hereby ENTERED in favor of Homestar Mortgage Services and HSBC Bank USA and against the plaintiffs on Count I of the plaintiffs’ complaint. BY THE COURT: /s/ Mary A. McLaughlin MARY A. McLAUGHLIN, J. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?