EDWARDS et al v. CITY OF EASTON et al
ORDER THAT ALL CLAIMS ASSERTED BY PLAINTIFF'S COMPANY ARE DISMISSED. DEFENDANTS CITY OF EASTON AND OFFICER BRIAN HERNCANE'S MOTION TO DISMISS 13 , IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. DEFENDANTS COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON, NORTHAMPTON COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, JOHN MORGANELLI, NORTHAMPTON COUNTY PRE-TRIAL SERVICES, AND ARKY COLON'S MOTION TO DISMISS 28 , IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. DEFENDANT RACHEL HADDAD'S PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS 40 , IS DENIED. AL L DISMISSALS ARE WITHOUT PREJUDICE, AND PLAINTIFF IS GRANTED LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT WIHTIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN P. FULLAM ON 9/10/09. 9/11/09 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PARTIES AND UNREPS AND E-MAILED.(ti, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DONOVAN EDWARDS, et al. v. CITY OF EASTON, et al. : : : : : ORDER AND NOW, this 10th day of September 2009, upon consideration CIVIL ACTION
of Defendants' pending motions to dismiss and Plaintiff's responses thereto, IT IS ORDERED: 1. All claims asserted by Plaintiff's company, Value in Partnership Development Company, LLC, are DISMISSED. 2. Defendants City of Easton and Officer Brian Herncane's Motion to Dismiss (Document Number 13) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: a. Count III is DISMISSED to the extent that it asserts a substantive due process claim against the City of Easton Code Enforcement Office. b. Count VI is DISMISSED to the extent that it asserts a procedural due process claim for the seizure of Plaintiff's van. c. Counts XIII, XIV, XV, XIX, and XX are DISMISSED to the extent that they are asserted against the City of Easton, its agencies, or its employees in their official capacities. d. In all other respects, the motion is DENIED. 3. Defendants County of Northampton, Northampton County District Attorney's Office, John Morganelli, Northampton County Pre-trial Services, and Arky Colon's Motion to Dismiss (Document Number 28) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: a. As against the District Attorney's Office and John Morganelli, Counts II, III, IV, IX, XIII, XIV, XVI, XIX, and XX are DISMISSED.
Count VII is DISMISSED. In all other respects, the motion is DENIED.
4. Defendant Rachel Haddad's Partial Motion to Dismiss (Document Number 40) is DENIED. 5. All dismissals are WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and Plaintiff is GRANTED LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT within 30 days of the date of this Order.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ John P. Fullam John P. Fullam, Sr. J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?