SCOTT v. DIGUGLIELMO et al
Filing
41
ORDER of MEMORANDUM (DOC. #40) that DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT, CHANGE VENUE AND STRIKE JURY DEMAND (DOC. #31) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART:... ADDITIONALLY, DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR A MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT IN THE ALTERNATIVE (DOC. #39) IS DENIED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE ANITA B. BRODY ON 5/1/2009. 5/1/2009 ENTERED AND COPIES VIA ECF AND U.S. MAIL.(mo, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
BERNARD R. SCOTT, SR., Plaintiff, v. DAVID D. DIGUGLIELMO, et al., Defendants.
: : : : : : : ORDER
CIVIL ACTION No. 08-1663
AND NOW, this ___1st___ day of May, 2009, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint, Change Venue and Strike Jury Demand (Doc. #31) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part: · · Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Count One is GRANTED. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Count Two is GRANTED as to Defendants DiGuglielmo, Murray, and Scott and DENIED as to Defendant Beard. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Count Three is GRANTED. Defendants' Motion to Change Venue is DENIED. Defendants' Motion to Strike Jury Demand is GRANTED.
· · ·
Additionally, Defendants' Motion for a More Definite Statement in the Alternative (Doc. # 39) is DENIED. s/Anita B. Brody ANITA B. BRODY, J.
Copies VIA ECF on
to:
Copies MAILED on
to:
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?