TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY v. STENGEL et al

Filing 91

MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION ORDER THAT DEFTS' MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ARE GRANTED. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE AS CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PETRESE B. TUCKER ON 12/21/2011. 12/22/2011 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(tomg, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY Plaintiff, v. STENGEL ET AL. Defendants. : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-cv-2583 ORDER AND NOW, this ____ day of December 2011, upon consideration of Defendants Ledgewood Law Firm and Kevin Berry, Esq.’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 67), Defendant Stengel’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 68), Plaintiff’s Responses (Docs. 72, 73), Defendant Stengel’s Reply (Doc. 78), Plaintiff’s SurReply (Doc. 81), Defendants Ledgewood Law Firm and Kevin Berry, Esq.’s Reply (Doc. 82), Defendants’ Supplemental Replies (Docs. 88, 89), and the hearing held before the Court on Tuesday, July 19, 2011, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED and DECREED that Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment are GRANTED.1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall mark this case as CLOSED for statistical purposes. BY THE COURT: /s/ Petrese B. Tucker ________________________________ Hon. Petrese B. Tucker, U.S.D.J. 1 This Court rendered its memorandum opinion in connection with the above order on December __, 2011.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?