LOUIS v. RUIS INVENTORY SPECIALIST

Filing 58

ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 52), PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION (DOC. NO. 54), DEFENDANT'S REPLY MEMORANDUM (DOC. NO. 55), AND ALL THE ACCOMPANYING EXHIBITS, AND FOR THE REASONS PROVIDED I N THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM, DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. DENIED WITH RESPECT TO PLAINTIFF'S DISPARATE TREATMENT CLAIM; AND GRANTED WITH RESPECT TO ALL OTHER STATE AND FEDERAL CLAIMS RAISED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LOUIS H. POLLAK ON 8/18/2011. 8/22/2011 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

FRANCES JEAN-LOUIS,

Civil Action

Plaintiff,

No. 08-2662

v.
RGIS INVENTORY SPECIALISTS,
LLC,
Defendant.

ORDER
AND NOW, this 18th day of August, 2011, upon consideration of defendant’s
motion for summary judgment (Docket No. 52), plaintiff’s opposition (Docket No. 54),
defendant’s reply memorandum (Docket No. 55), and the all the accompanying exhibits,
and for the reasons provided in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED
that defendant’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED
IN PART in accordance with the accompanying opinion as follows:
1.

DENIED with respect to plaintiff’s disparate treatment claim; and

2.

GRANTED with respect to all other state and federal claims raised.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Louis H. Pollak
Pollak, J.