STANKIEWICZ v. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.

Filing 20

ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF THE DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND COMPEL ARBITRATION 6 , PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE THERETO 9 , DEFENDANT'S REPLY BRIEF 12 , AND THE PLAINTIFF'S SUR-REPLY 15 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT THE MOTIO N IS DENIED IN ITS ENTIRETY. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE DEFENDANT SHALL FILE AN ANSWER TO THE COMPLAINT WITHIN TWENTY (20) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 9/30/09. 10/1/09 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA P A U L S. STANKIEWICZ, P laintiff v. C I S C O SYSTEMS, INC., D e fe n d a n t : : : : : : : C IV IL ACTION NO. 08-2754 ORDER A N D NOW, this 30th day of September, 2009, upon consideration of the d ef en d an t's motion to dismiss and compel arbitration (Document #6), the plaintiff's re sp o n s e thereto (Document #9), the defendant's reply brief (Document #12), and the p la in tif f 's sur-reply (Document #15), it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is DENIED in its entirety. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant shall file an answer to the co m p lain t within twenty (20) days of the date of this Order. B Y THE COURT: /s/ Lawrence F. Stengel LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?