MILL BRIDGE V, LLC v. BENTON et al

Filing 75

ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF. THIS CASE IS CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE RONALD L. BUCKWALTER ON 12/21/10. 12/22/10 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, )

Download PDF
MILL BRIDGE V, LLC v. BENTON et al Doc. 75 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MILL BRIDGE V, INC. as successor to VAN DER MOOLEN OPTIONS USA, LLC c/o VAN DER MOOLEN SPECIALISTS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. I. ISABELLE BENTON, BENTON PARTNERS II, LLP, JAMES KENKELEN, a transferee, and EILEEN WHITE, a transferee, Defendants. : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-2806 ORDER AND NOW, this 21st day of December, 2010, upon consideration of the Motion for Summary Judgment by Defendants I. Isabelle Benton and Benton Partners II, LLP (Docket No. 50), Defendants Statement of Undisputed Facts and Evidentiary Index (Docket No. 51), Plaintiff Mill Bridge V, Inc.'s Response (Docket No. 64), and Defendants' Reply Brief (Docket No. 69), and upon hearing oral argument by the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff. This case is CLOSED. BY THE COURT: s/ Ronald L. Buckwalter RONALD L. BUCKWALTER, S.J. Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?