MEENAN v. PALAKOVICH et al
ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED AND DISMISSED; A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY SHALL NOT ISSUE; THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LEGROME D. DAVIS ON 5/11/09. 5/12/09 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PARTIES.(pr, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA THOMAS MEEHAN vs. JOHN PALAKOVICH, et al. : : : : : CIVIL ACTION
ORDER AND NOW, this 11th day of May 2009, upon consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 1), Respondents' Answer in Opposition thereto (Doc. No. 5), Petitioner's Traverse Opinion to Respondent's Brief in Opposition (Doc. No. 7), the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T. Hey (Doc. No. 10), and Petitioner's written objections thereto (Doc. No. 11), it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. 2. 3.
The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED AND ADOPTED; The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED AND DISMISSED; A certificate of appealability SHALL NOT issue, in that the Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right and because reasonable jurists would not find the correctness of the procedural aspects of this decision debatable. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); and The Clerk of Court shall mark this case CLOSED for statistical purposes.
BY THE COURT: /S/LEGROME D. DAVIS Legrome D. Davis, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?