BISTRIAN v. WARDEN TROY LEVI et al

Filing 30

ORDER THAT FDC DEFTS' MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED IN PART, DISMISSED IN PART; COUNTS VI-IX ARE DISMISSED, AND COUNT I-V AND X REMAIN; DEFT. REYNOLDS' MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED IN PART, DISMISSED IN PART. COUNT IX IS DISMISSED, AND COUNT IV REMAINS; DEFT. U.S.'S MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED. COUNTS XII-XIX ARE DISMISSED; AND COUNT XI IS DIMISSED BY CONSENT OF PLFF.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 7/29/10. 7/30/10 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(pr, )

Download PDF
BISTRIAN v. WARDEN TROY LEVI et al Doc. 30 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ___________________________________________ : PETER BISTRIAN, : Plaintiff, : v. : : WARDEN TROY LEVI, et al., : Defendants. : __________________________________________: ORDER AND NOW, this 29th day of July, 2010, upon consideration of Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint [Doc. No. 17], FDC Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 20], Defendant Reynolds's Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint of Plaintiff Peter Bistrian [Doc. No. 18], Defendant United States' Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 21], Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law in Opposition [Doc. No. 24], Defendants' reply briefs, and for the reasons stated in the attached Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1) FDC Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED in part, DISMISSED in part. Counts VI-IX are dismissed, and Counts I-V and X remain; 2) Defendant Reynolds's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED in part, DISMISSED in part. Count IX is dismissed, and Count IV remains; 3) Defendant United States' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. Counts XII-XIX are dismissed; and 4) Count XI is DISMISSED by consent of Plaintiff. It is so ORDERED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Cynthia M. Rufe ______________________ CYNTHIA M. RUFE, J. CIVIL NO. 08-3010 Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?