BISTRIAN v. WARDEN TROY LEVI et al
Filing
545
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION (DOC. 520) IS DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY IN EXCESS OF 10 PAGES TO THE UNITED STATES RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES (DOC. 526) IS GRANTED AND PLAINTIFFS REPLY IN SUPPORT OF HIS APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND EXPENSES IS DEEMED FILED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 1/30/23. 1/30/23 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rf, )
Case 2:08-cv-03010-CMR Document 545 Filed 01/30/23 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
PETER BISTRIAN,
Plaintiff,
v.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-3010
WARDEN TROY LEVI, FDC
PHILADELPHIA, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 30th day of January 2023, upon consideration of Defendant United
States’ Motion for Reconsideration [Doc. No. 520], and the responses thereto, and for the
reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that
Defendant’s Motion is DENIED.
It is further ORDERED that, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File a
Reply in Excess of 10 Pages to the United States’ Response to Plaintiff’s Application for
Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses [Doc. No. 526], the Motion is is GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s
Reply in Support of his Application for Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses [Doc. No. 527] is
DEEMED FILED. 1
It is so ORDERED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Cynthia M. Rufe
_____________________
CYNTHIA M. RUFE, J.
1
The Court will issue a separate order ruling on the specific amount of monetary sanctions.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?