BISTRIAN v. WARDEN TROY LEVI et al

Filing 545

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION (DOC. 520) IS DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY IN EXCESS OF 10 PAGES TO THE UNITED STATES RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES (DOC. 526) IS GRANTED AND PLAINTIFFS REPLY IN SUPPORT OF HIS APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND EXPENSES IS DEEMED FILED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 1/30/23. 1/30/23 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rf, )

Download PDF
Case 2:08-cv-03010-CMR Document 545 Filed 01/30/23 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA PETER BISTRIAN, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-3010 WARDEN TROY LEVI, FDC PHILADELPHIA, et al., Defendants. ORDER AND NOW, this 30th day of January 2023, upon consideration of Defendant United States’ Motion for Reconsideration [Doc. No. 520], and the responses thereto, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion is DENIED. It is further ORDERED that, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File a Reply in Excess of 10 Pages to the United States’ Response to Plaintiff’s Application for Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses [Doc. No. 526], the Motion is is GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s Reply in Support of his Application for Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses [Doc. No. 527] is DEEMED FILED. 1 It is so ORDERED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Cynthia M. Rufe _____________________ CYNTHIA M. RUFE, J. 1 The Court will issue a separate order ruling on the specific amount of monetary sanctions.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?