IBEW - NECA LOCAL 505 HEALTH & WELFARE PLAN v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION

Filing 289

ORDER of MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION (DOC. #287) that DEFENDANT SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORP D/B/A GLAXOSMITHKLINE'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON NOERR-PENNINGTON GROUNDS (NO. 08-3149 (DIRECT), ECF NO. 151; NO. 08-3301 (INDIRECT), ECF NO. 190; NO. 09-1638 (ROXANE), ECF NO. 98) IS DENIED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE ANITA B. BRODY ON 6/2/2011. 6/2/2011 ENTERED AND COPIES VIA ECF AND U.S. MAIL.(mo, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN RE FLONASE ANTITRUST LITIGATION THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: ALL ACTIONS ROXANE LABORATORIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION d/b/a GLAXOSMITHKLINE, Defendant. : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-3149 (Direct) NO. 08-3301 (Indirect) CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-1638 ORDER AND NOW, this _2ND___ day of June 2011, it is ORDERED that Defendant SmithKline Beecham Corp. d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline’s Motion for Summary Judgment on NoerrPennington Grounds (No. 08-3149 (Direct), ECF No. 151; No. 08-3301 (Indirect), ECF No. 190; No. 09-1638 (Roxane), ECF No. 98) is DENIED. s/Anita B. Brody __________________________ ANITA B. BRODY, J. Copies VIA ECF on _________ to: Copies MAILED on _______ to:

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?