IBEW - NECA LOCAL 505 HEALTH & WELFARE PLAN v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Filing
289
ORDER of MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION (DOC. #287) that DEFENDANT SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORP D/B/A GLAXOSMITHKLINE'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON NOERR-PENNINGTON GROUNDS (NO. 08-3149 (DIRECT), ECF NO. 151; NO. 08-3301 (INDIRECT), ECF NO. 190; NO. 09-1638 (ROXANE), ECF NO. 98) IS DENIED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE ANITA B. BRODY ON 6/2/2011. 6/2/2011 ENTERED AND COPIES VIA ECF AND U.S. MAIL.(mo, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN RE FLONASE ANTITRUST
LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:
ALL ACTIONS
ROXANE LABORATORIES, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM
CORPORATION d/b/a
GLAXOSMITHKLINE,
Defendant.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 08-3149 (Direct)
NO. 08-3301 (Indirect)
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 09-1638
ORDER
AND NOW, this _2ND___ day of June 2011, it is ORDERED that Defendant
SmithKline Beecham Corp. d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline’s Motion for Summary Judgment on NoerrPennington Grounds (No. 08-3149 (Direct), ECF No. 151; No. 08-3301 (Indirect), ECF No. 190;
No. 09-1638 (Roxane), ECF No. 98) is DENIED.
s/Anita B. Brody
__________________________
ANITA B. BRODY, J.
Copies VIA ECF on _________ to:
Copies MAILED on _______ to:
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?