HATCHER v. DIGUGLIELMO et al
ORDER THAT: PLFF'S OBJECTIONS ARE OVERRULED AND THE MAGISTRATE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; PLFF'S PETITION IS DENIED AND DISMISSED; THE CLERK SHALL CLOSE THIS MATTER FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE C. DARNELL JONES, II ON 10/26/09. 10/28/09 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(fb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
VINCENT HATCHER, Petitioner, v. DAVID DiGUGLIELMO, et al., Respondents.
CIVIL NO. 08-3572
AND NOW, this 26th day of October, 2009, upon consideration of: Plaintiff's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 1) and Respondents' Response thereto (Doc. No. 11); Plaintiff's Traverse/Amended Traverse (Doc. Nos. 13 & 14) and Respondents' Response thereto (Doc. No. 12); Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T. Hey's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 15); and, Plaintiff's Objections thereto (Doc. No. 16), along with Respondents' Response (Doc. No. 21), it is hereby ORDERED and DECREED that: (1) Plaintiff's Objections are OVERRULED and the Magistrate's Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED; (2) (3) Plaintiff's Petition is DENIED and DISMISSED; There exists no substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right which would require the issuance of a certificate of appealability; and, (4) The Clerk shall close this matter for statistical purposes.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ C. Darnell Jones, II
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?