DOTSON v. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME TO FILE REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION 17 , IS DENIED AS MOOT BECAUSE PLAINTIFF FILED A TIMELY REPLY. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO CERTIFY CLASS 15 , IS DENIED FOR THE REASONS STATED IN THE ATTACHED OPINION. PLAINTIFF MAY PROCEED ON HIS INDIVIDUAL CLAIM FOR RELIEF. SIGNED BY HONORABLE NORMA L. SHAPIRO ON 6/3/09. 6/4/09 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED AND FAXED BY CHAMBERS.(ti, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
LINWOOD DOTSON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC
: : : : : : : :
CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-3744
ORDER AND NOW, this 3rd day of June, 2009, upon consideration of plaintiff's Motion to Certify Class (paper no. 15), plaintiff's Motion to Enlarge Time to File Reply Brief in Support of Motion for Class Certification (paper no. 17), and defendant's responses thereto, it is ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's Motion to Enlarge Time to File Reply Brief in Support of Motion for Class Certification (paper no. 17) is DENIED as moot because plaintiff filed a timely reply. Plaintiff's Motion to Certify Class (paper no. 15) is DENIED for the reasons stated in the attached Opinion. Plaintiff may proceed on his individual claim for relief.
____/s/ Norma L. Shapiro_________________ J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?