JOHN DOE et al v. SCHNEIDER et al

Filing 165

ORDER THAT PLFF'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED. SUSAN SCHNEIDER'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF THE APOGEE FOUNDATION, MARJORIE SCHNEIDER & BERNARD SCHNEIDER IS GRANTED IN PART & DENIED IN PART, ETC. KENNETH SCHNEIDER'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 9/30/13. 9/30/13 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JOHN DOE

v.

KENNETH SCHNEIDER, et al.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION

NO. 08-3805

ORDER
AND NOW, this 30th day of September, 2013, upon consideration of “Plaintiffs’ [sic]
Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Based Upon Counts I and IV of the Plaintiff’s Afirst [sic]
Amended Complaint” (Doc. No. 125), the “Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendant Susan
Schneider, M.D.” (Doc. No. 144), the “Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendants The
Apogee Foundation, Marjorie Schneider, and Bernard Schneider” (Doc. No. 145), and the
“Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendant Kenneth Schneider” (Doc. No. 146), the
responses and replies thereto, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum
opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that:
— Plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment is DENIED.
— Susan Schneider’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED.
— The motion for summary judgment of The Apogee Foundation, Marjorie Schneider
and Bernard Schneider is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. With regard to
the Apogee Foundation, the motion is granted as to Count I and denied as to Counts
III and IV. With regard to Bernard Schneider, the motion is granted in its entirety.
With regard to Marjorie Schneider, the motion is granted as to Counts I, III and VI,
and denied as to Count IV.

— Kenneth Schneider’s motion for summary judgment is DENIED.

BY THE COURT:
/s/ Mitchell S. Goldberg
__________________________
Mitchell S. Goldberg, J.