WILLIAMS v. DiGUGLIEMO et al
ORDER THAT PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDAITON ARE OVERRULED; THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED AS SET FORTH IN OUR MEMORANDUM OF THIS DATE; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; THERE IS NO BASIS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY; THE CLERK SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE STATISTICALLY.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN R. PADOVA ON 5/20/10. 5/20/10 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(pr, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CARNELL WILLIAMS v. DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, ET AL. : : : : : ORDER AND NOW, this 20th day of May, 2010, upon careful and independent consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Docket No. 1), all attendant and responsive briefing, review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Lynne A. Sitarski, and consideration of Petitioner's Objections to the Report and Recommendation and Respondent's Response thereto, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 1. 2. Petitioner's Objections to the Report and Recommendation are OVERRULED; The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED as set forth in our Memorandum of this date; 3. 4. 5. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability; The Clerk shall CLOSE this case statistically. CIVIL ACTION
BY THE COURT: /s/ John R. Padova ______________________ John R. Padova, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?