THE KNIT WITH v. KNITTING FEVER, INC. et al

Filing 251

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANT DIANE ELALOUFS MOTION IS GRANTED AND THE CLIAM AGAINST HER FOR CONSPIRACY PURSUANT TO THE RACKETEER INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATIONS ACT, 18 U.S.C. 1962(d) IS DISMISSED. DEFENDANT JEFFREY J. DENECKE'S MOTI ON IS GRANTED AND THE CLAIM AGAINST HIM FOR CONSPIRACY PURSUANT TO THE RACKETEER INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATIONS ACT, 18 U.S.C. 1962(d) IS DISMISSED. DEFENDANT JAY OPPERMANS MOTION IS DENIED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE RONALD L. BUCKWALTER ON 3/29/11. 3/30/11 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(rf, )

THE KNIT WITH v. KNITTING FEVER, INC. et al

Doc. 251

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

THE KNIT WITH,

: : Plaintiff, : : v. : : KNITTING FEVER, INC., : DESIGNER YARNS, LTD., : FILATURA PETTINATA V.V.G. DI : STEFANO VACCARI & C., SION : ELALOUF, DIANE ELALOUF, JEFFREY : J. DENECKE, JR., JAY OPPERMAN, and : DEBBIE BLISS, : : Defendants. : THE KNIT WITH, Plaintiff, v. EISAKU NORO & CO., LTD., KNITTING FEVER, INC., SION ELALOUF, DIANE ELALOUF, and JAY OPPERMAN, Defendants. : : : : : : : : : : : :

CIVIL ACTION

NO. 08-4221

CIVIL ACTION

NO. 08-4775

ORDER AND NOW, this 29th day of March, 2011, upon consideration of (1) Defendant Diane Elalouf's Motion for Judgment on Pleadings (Docket No. 229) and Plaintiff The Knit With's Response (Docket No. 238); (2) Defendant Jeffrey J. Denecke, Jr.'s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Docket No. 230) and Plaintiff's Response (Docket No. 239); and (3) Defendant Jay Opperman's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Docket No. 231) and Plaintiff's Response

Dockets.Justia.com

(Docket No. 240), it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Defendant Diane Elalouf's Motion is GRANTED and the claim against her for conspiracy pursuant to the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d), is DISMISSED; Defendant Jeffrey J. Denecke's Motion is GRANTED and the claim against him for conspiracy pursuant to the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d), is DISMISSED; Defendant Jay Opperman's Motion is DENIED.

2.

3.

It is so ORDERED.

BY THE COURT:

s/ Ronald L. Buckwalter RONALD L. BUCKWALTER, S.J.