RETZLER et al v. WALLACE et al

Filing 32

ORDER THAT MOTION TO DISMISS FILED BY RUSSELL P. SACCO IS GRANTED. MOTION TO DISMISS FILED BY BRISTOL TOWNSHIP POLICE, EDWARD WALLACE, TOWNSHIP OF BRISTOL, BRADFORD TOLOSKY, JAMES P. MCANDREW, KEITH BERTRAM, & MICHAEL EGAN IS GRANTED. MOTIO TO DISMSI S FILED BY DIANE FARAGO IS GRANTED. MOTION TO DISMISS FILED BY BUCKS COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY, FRANK DYKES, TIMOTHY CARROLL, ROBERT GORMAN, TERRY LACHMAN, JOHN KNOWLES, & BUCKS COUNTY DETECTIVES IS GRANTED. THE CASE AGAINST ALL NAMED DEFTS, INCLUDING JOHN FARAGO, IS DISMISSED. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE BERLE M. SCHILLER ON 6/24/09. 6/25/09 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED AND MAILED TO PRO SE PLFFS AND UNREPRESENTED PARTY.(kw, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTLEY RETZLER AND LAURA WARDEN, Plaintiffs, v. EDWARD WALLACE, et al., Defendants. : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION No. 08-4245 ORDER AND NOW, this 24th day of June, 2009, upon consideration of the motions to dismiss filed by Defendants, Plaintiffs' responses thereto, any replies filed thereon, and for the reasons outlined in this Court's opinion dated June 24, 2009, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Motion to Dismiss filed by Russell P. Sacco (Document No. 8) is GRANTED. 2. The Motion to Dismiss filed by Bristol Township Police, Edward Wallace, Township of Bristol, Bradford Tolosky, James P. McAndrew, Keith Bertram, and Michael Egan (Document No. 9) is GRANTED. 3. 4. The Motion to Dismiss filed by Diane Farago (Document No. 20) is GRANTED. The Motion to Dismiss filed by Bucks County District Attorney, Frank Dykes, Timothy Carroll, Robert Gorman, Terry Lachman, John Knowles, and Bucks County Detectives (Document No. 29) is GRANTED. 5. The case against all named Defendants, including Jon Farago, is DISMISSED. 6. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. BY THE COURT: Berle M. Schiller, J. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?