ALERS et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al

Filing 25

ORDER THAT DEFTS' MOTION TO WITHDRAW DEEMED ADMISSIONS IS GRANTED. PLFF'S CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED. DEFTS' MOTION TO DISMISS IN PART IS GRANTED IN PART & DENIED IN PART, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, ETC. PLFFS ARE GRANTED LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN 7 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER TO RE-ASSERT DISMISSED CLAIMS AND/OR CLARIFY REMAINING CLAIMS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE C. DARNELL JONES, II ON 8/26/09. 8/28/09 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIGUEL A. ALERS and DENISE SZUSTOWICZ Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, et al. Defendants. : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-4745 ORDER AND NOW, this 26th day of August, 2009, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Defendants' Motion to Withdraw Deemed Admissions (Doc. No. 21) is GRANTED. 2. 3. Plaintiff's Cross-Motion [sic] for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 20) is DENIED. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss in Part (Docket No. 19) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, as follows: a. Count I is dismissed as to Plaintiff Szustowicz; b. Count V is dismissed; and c. Count VI is dismissed as follows: (i) Pennsylvania Minimum Wage Act claim is dismissed except as to Plaintiff Alers against Defendants Seaborough and Brown, and (ii) Emotional Distress [sic] claim is dismissed. 4. Plaintiffs are GRANTED LEAVE to file a Second Amended Complaint within seven days of the date of this order to re-assert dismissed claims and/or clarify remaining claims. There will be no further opportunity for Plaintiffs to amend and no extension of this deadline. 5. Defendants shall file a responsive pleading within twenty days of the service of any Second Amended Complaint. The parties are strongly cautioned to heed footnote 1 of the Court's accompanying Memorandum. BY THE COURT: /s/ C. Darnell Jones II _________________________ C. DARNELL JONES II, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?