THE KNIT WITH v. EISAKU NORO & CO., LTD. et al

Filing 102

ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF PLFF THE KNIT WITH'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON THE COUNTERCLAIMS OF KNITTING FEVER, INC. & DEFT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON COUNTERCLAIM FOR DEFAMATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT BOTH MOTIONS ARE DENIED.SIGNED BY HONORABLE RONALD L. BUCKWALTER ON 8/8/12. 8/9/12 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
THE KNIT WITH,

:
:
Plaintiff,
:
:
v.
:
:
KNITTING FEVER, INC.,
:
DESIGNER YARNS, LTD.,
:
FILATURA PETTINATA V.V.G. DI
:
STEFANO VACCARI & C., SION
:
ELALOUF, DIANE ELOUF, JEFFREY J. :
DENECKE, JR., JAY OPPERMAN, and
:
DEBBIE BLISS,
:
:
Defendants.
:
THE KNIT WITH,
Plaintiff,
v.
EISAKU NORO & CO., LTD.,
KNITTING FEVER, INC.,
SION ELALOUF, DIANE ELALOUF,
and JAY OPPERMAN,
Defendants.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION

NO. 08-4221

CIVIL ACTION

NO. 08-4775

ORDER
AND NOW, this 8th day of August, 2012, upon consideration of (1) Plaintiff The Knit
With’s Motion for Summary Judgment on the Counterclaims of Knitting Fever, Inc. (Docket No.
349), Defendant Knitting Fever, Inc.’s Response (Docket No. 359), Plaintiff’s Reply Brief
(Docket No. 383), and Defendant’s Sur-reply Brief (Docket No. 396); and (2) Defendant’s
Motion for Summary Judgment on Counterclaim for Defamation (Docket No. 343); Plaintiff’s

Response (Docket No. 360); Defendant’s Reply Brief (Docket No. 381), and Defendant’s Surreply Brief (Docket No. 394), it is hereby ORDERED that both Motions are DENIED.
It is so ORDERED.

BY THE COURT:

s/ Ronald L. Buckwalter
RONALD L. BUCKWALTER, S.J.