ROULHAC v. LAWLER et al
ORDER THAT THE OBJECTIONS ARE OVERRULED; THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE SITARSKI IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DISMISSED; AND THERE IS NO PROBABLE CAUSE TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE ON 2/23/10. 2/24/10 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(ti, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA PAUL ROULHAC v. RAYMOND M. LAWLER, et al : : : : : : ORDER AND NOW, this 23rd day of February,2010, upon consideration of the Petition for W rit of Habeas Corpus (Document No. 1), the Respondents' Answer to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Document No. 5), the Petitioner's "Traverse Response" to Respondents' Answer Filed (Document No. 10), the Report and Recommendation filed by United States Magistrate Judge Lynne A. Sitarski (Document No. 22), the petitioner's objections to the Report and Recommendation, and after a thorough and independent review of the record, it is ORDERED that: 1. 2. The objections are OVERRULED; The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Sitarski is CIVIL ACTION
APPROVED and ADOPTED; 3. 4. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED; and, There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability.
/Timothy J. Savage TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?