WALSH v. KLOPOTOSKI et al

Filing 36

ORDER AS FOLLOWS: THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION IS DENIED. PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS ARE OVERRULED; PETITIONER'S REQUEST FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL IS DENIED; THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 1/25/12. 1/25/12 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(fb)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
__________________________________________
:
THOMAS A. WALSH,
:
Petitioner,
:
CIVIL ACTION
vs.
:
:
NO. 08-5273
MICHAEL D. KLOPOTOSKI, et al.,
:
Respondents.
:
__________________________________________:
ORDER
AND NOW, this 25th day of January 2012, after a careful and independent review of the
Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 27), Petitioner’s Objections thereto (Doc. No. 32),
Petitioner’s Request for Appointment of Counsel (Doc. No. 34), and the entire record in this
case, and for the reasons stated in the Opinion filed this day, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1.

The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

2.

The Petition (Doc. No. 1) is DENIED;

3.

Petitioner’s Objections are OVERRULED;

4.

Petitioner’s Request for Appointment of Counsel is DENIED; and

5.

A Certificate of Appealability SHALL NOT ISSUE.

The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.
It is so ORDERED.

BY THE COURT:
/s/ Hon. Cynthia M. Rufe
_______________________
HON. CYNTHIA M. RUFE