VASSALOTTI v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.

Filing 64

ORDER of MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION (DOC #63)that DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. #56) ON ALL REMAINING COUNTS OF PLAINTIFF'S THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY J UDGMENT ON COUNT IV (FCRA) IS GRANTED. DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON COUNT V (UTPCPL) IS DENIED. DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON COUNT II (BREACH OF CONTRACT) IS DENIED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO PRESENT MORE AUTHORITY ON THE SAME ISSUES AT A LATER STAGE IN THE PROCEEDINGS.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE ANITA B. BRODY ON 9/22/2011. 9/22/2011 ENTERED AND COPIES VIA ECF AND U.S. MAIL.(mo, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MARIA VASSALOTTI, Plaintiff v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Defendant : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-5574 ORDER AND NOW, this 22nd day of September 2011, it is ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 56) on all remaining Counts of Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Count IV (FCRA) is GRANTED. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgement on Count V (UTPCPL) is DENIED. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgement on Count II (Breach of Contract) is DENIED, without prejudice to present more authority on the same issues at a later stage in the proceedings. s/Anita B. Brody __________________________ ANITA B. BRODY, J. Copies VIA ECF on _________ to: Copies MAILED on _______ to:

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?