WYLIE v. ASTRUE
ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF PLAINTIFF'S BRIEF AND STATEMENT 8 , DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE 9 , THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 12 , PLAINTIFF'S WRITTEN OBJECTIONS 13 , AND AFTER A THOROUGH AND INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF THE RECORD, IT IS O RDERED THAT PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS ARE OVERRULLED; THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR REVIEW IS DENIED; AND JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF THE DEFENDANT AND AGAINST THE PLAINTIFF. SIGNED BY HONORABLE TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE ON 9/17/09. 9/17/09 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DEBORAH M. WYLIE v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-5584
ORDER AND NOW, this 17th day of September, 2009, upon consideration of the Plaintiff's Brief and Statement of Issues in Support of Request for Review (Document No. 8), the defendant's response (Document No. 9), the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Thomas J. Reuter (Document No. 12), the Plaintiff's Written Objections (Document No. 13), and after a thorough and independent review of the record, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. 2. 3. 4. The plaintiff's objections are OVERRULED; The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED; The plaintiff's Request for Review is DENIED; and JUDGMENT is entered in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiff.
/s/ Timothy J. Savage TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?