JOHNSON v. BOROUGH OF COLLINGDALE et al
MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION ORDER THAT THE DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. #20) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; BY AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES, BOROUGH OF COLLINGDALE IS DISMISSED AS A DEFENDANT IN THIS CASE.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE BERLE M. SCHILLER ON 9/25/2009. 9/25/2009 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(tomg, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DENNIS JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. BOROUGH OF COLLINGDALE; OFFICER DEAN KEMP; OFFICER ROBERT MARVIL; CHIEF ROBERT ADAMS; CORPORAL EDWARD ROBINSON, Defendants. : : : : : : : : : : :
ORDER AND NOW, this 25th day of September, 2009, upon consideration of Defendants' motion for summary judgment, and Plaintiff's response thereto, and for the reasons contained in the Court's Memorandum dated September 25, 2009, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Document No. 20) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows: a. The motion is GRANTED as to Chief Robert Adams on the claims for unlawful arrest, unlawful use of force, and malicious prosecution. b. The motion is GRANTED as to Robert Marvil and Edward Robinson on the malicious prosecution claim. c. 2. The motion is DENIED in all other respects.
By agreement of the parties, Borough of Collingdale is DISMISSED as a Defendant in this case. BY THE COURT:
Berle M. Schiller, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?