REGAN v. LAW OFFICES OF EDWIN A. ABRAHAMSEN & ASSOCIATES, P.C. et al

Filing 24

MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION ORDER THAT THE DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. #12) IS DENIED, AND THAT PLAINTIFF'S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMAY JUDGMENT (DOC. #19) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS OUTLINED HEREIN.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WILLIAM H. YOHN, JR ON 12/1/2009. 12/2/2009 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(tomg, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA : LISA L. REGAN, : : Plaintiff : : v. : : LAW OFFICES OF EDWIN A. : ABRAHAMSEN & ASSOCIATES, P.C., et al., : : Defendants. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-5923 ORDER AND NOW, this _____ day of December, 2009, upon consideration of defendants' summary judgment motion (docket no. 12) and plaintiff's response thereto, and plaintiff's crossmotion for summary judgment (docket no. 19), defendants' response, and plaintiff's reply thereto, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants' motion for summary judgment is DENIED, and that plaintiff's cross-motion for summary judgment is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Summary judgment is GRANTED in favor of plaintiff and against defendants on the sole issue of defendants' liability for violations of 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692c(a)(2) and 1692c(b) with respect to EAA's communications to plaintiff and her parents on plaintiff's Account 1 only. Plaintiff's cross-motion for summary judgment is DENIED in all other respects. s/ William H. Yohn Jr., Judge William H. Yohn Jr., Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?