ASKEW v. THE TRUSTEES OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE CHURCH OF THE LORD JESUS CHRIST OF THE APOSTOLIC FAITH, INC. et al
Filing
54
ORDER THAT DEFTS' MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 12(b)(1) IS GRANTED. DEFTS' MOTION TO FILE A JOINT REPLY IS GRANTED. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL DOCKET DEFTS' REPLY, WHICH IS ATTACHED TO THEIR MOTION AT EXHIBIT A; PLFF'S MOTION TO APPOINT RECEIVER IS DENIED AS MOOT; & THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE STATISTICALLY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE STEWART DALZELL ON 3/11/11. 3/11/11 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )
ASKEW v. THE TRUSTEES OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE CHURCH OF THE LOR...APOSTOLIC FAITH, INC. et al Doc. 54
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JOSEPH ASKEW
: : v. : : THE TRUSTEES OF THE GENERAL : ASSEMBLY OF THE CHURCH OF THE : LORD JESUS CHRIST OF THE : APOSTOLIC FAITH, INC., et al. : ORDER
CIVIL ACTION
No. 09-15
AND NOW, this 11th day of March, 2011, upon consideration of plaintiff's motion to appoint receiver (docket entry # 44), defendants' response (docket entry # 47), defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) (docket entry # 49), plaintiff's response (docket entry # 50), defendants' motion for leave to file a joint reply (docket entry # 51), plaintiff's response to defendants' motion to file a joint reply (docket entry # 52), and in accordance with the foregoing Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of
jurisdiction pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) (docket entry # 49) is GRANTED; 2. Defendants' motion to file a joint reply (docket
entry # 51) is GRANTED;
Dockets.Justia.com
3.
The Clerk of Court shall DOCKET defendants' reply,
which is attached to their motion at Exhibit A; 4. Plaintiff's motion to appoint receiver (docket
entry # 44) is DENIED AS MOOT; and 5. statistically. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case
BY THE COURT:
__\s\Stewart Dalzell
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?