STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY v. GOPHER BAROQUE ENTERPRISES, LTD.
Filing
65
MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION ORDER THAT THE THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT'S BHS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO.37) IS GRANTED; THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT'S YOUNG'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO.41) IS GRANTED; THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT'S BSH MOTION TO PRECLUDE EXPERT TESTIMONY (DOC. NO.40) IS DENIED AS MOOT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 12/29/2010. 12/29/2010 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED. (kk, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
F O R THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY CO., Plaintiff CIVIL ACTION
v.
09-322 GOPHER BAROQUE ENTERPRISES, LTD., Defendant
ORDER
AND NOW, this 29th day of December 2010, upon consideration of Third-Party Defendant BSH's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 37), Third-Party Plaintiff Gopher Baroque's Opposition thereto (Docket No. 38), and BSH's Reply (Docket No. 39), it is hereby ORDERED that BSH's Motion is GRANTED. Further, upon consideration of Third-Party Defendant Young's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 41), Gopher Baroque's Opposition thereto (Docket No. 44), and Young's Reply (Docket No. 48), it is hereby ORDERED that Young's Motion is GRANTED. Finally, upon consideration ofBSH's Motion to Preclude Expert Testimony (Docket No. 40) and all briefing responsive thereto (Docket Nos. 42,43,46 and 47), it is hereby ORDERED that BSH's Motion is DENIED as MOOT.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?