RUMPF v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al

Filing 38

MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION ORDER THAT THE DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED AS TO THE CLAIMS OF BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY AND FAILURE TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS, AND DENIED AS TO THE CLAIM FOR PAYMENT OF DISABILITY BENEFITS, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 7/23/2010. 7/23/2010 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(kk, )

Download PDF
RUMPF v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al Doc. 38 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ELIZABETH M. RUMPF v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE CO., et al. : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-557 ORDER AND NOW, this 23rd day of July, 2010, for the reasons stated in the foregoing Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 24) is GRANTED as to the claims of breach of fiduciary duty and failure to produce documents, and DENIED as to the claim for payment of disability benefits. 2. Plaintiff shall file an appropriate motion for benefits, within fourteen (14) days. Defendants shall respond within fourteen (14) days thereafter, and Plaintiff may file a reply brief, limited to fifteen (15) pages, within seven (7) days thereafter. 3. The parties are urged to discuss this matter and advise the Court if they would like a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge David Strawbridge or another judicial officer or independent mediator. BY THE COURT: /s/ Michael M. Baylson Michael M. Baylson, U.S.D.J. O :\C I V I L 09-10\09-557 Rumpf v. Metropolitan\Rumpf v. Metropolitan - Order MSJ.wpd Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?